ISO 4628-6:2011 pdf free download – Paints and varnishes一Evaluation of degradation of coatings一Designation of quantity and size of defects, and of intensity of uniform changes in appearance一 Part 6: Assessment of degree of chalking by tape method

02-10-2022 comment

ISO 4628-6:2011 pdf free download – Paints and varnishes一Evaluation of degradation of coatings一Designation of quantity and size of defects, and of intensity of uniform changes in appearance一 Part 6: Assessment of degree of chalking by tape method.
ISO 4628-1 defines the system for designating the quantity and size of defects and the intensity of uniform changes of coatings and outlines the general principles of the system. This system is intended to be used, in particular, for defects caused by ageing and weathering, and for uniform changes such as colour changes, for example yellowing.
The other parts of ISO 4628 provide pictorial standards or other means for evaluating particular types of defect. As far as possible, already existing evaluation schemes have been used as the basis.
The chalking scale used in the first (1990) edition and in this third edition of ISO 4628-6 consists of photographic pictures of adhesive tapes with different amounts of pigment particles adhering to them. The pigment particles are not evenly distributed over each tape. The lower ratings in particular (i.e. 1 to 3) give the impression of cloudiness. All five ratings in the scale used in the first (1990) edition and in this edition are sufficiently different for visual-assessment purposes, however.
The scale used in the second (2007) edition was computer-generated. Thus the white dots representing the pigment particles were distributed very evenly over the tape, with the result that not all the ratings differed sufficiently well from each other for visual assessment to be carried out. While ratings 0,5 to 3,0 on the black background on the 2007 scale could be differentiated sufficiently well from each other, it was hardly possible to differentiate visually between ratings above 3,0, especially ratings 4 and 5. On the white background, the difference between ratings 0,5, 1,0 and 1,5 was not easy to discern. The differences between ratings 1,5 to 5,0 were more evident, however.
Comparing the 1990 scale with the 2007 scale, it would appear that rating 1 on the 1990 scale corresponded to 0,5 on the 2007 scale, and rating 2 on the 1990 scale corresponded to 1 on the 2007 scale.
It was therefore decided that the 2007 scale was unsuitable for use in the visual assessment of the degree of chalking of paints over the whole rating scale from 0,5 to 5,0.
This part of ISO 4628 provides pictorial reference standards for designating the degree of chalking of paint coatings. It also describes a method by which the degree of chalking is rated. In using this method, it is essential that care be taken to distinguish between true degradation products and adhering dirt, particularly when chalking is slight.
2 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
chalking
appearance of a loosely adherent fine powder on the surface of a paint coating, arising from the degradation of one or more of its constituents
3 Principle
The chalking is removed from the coating under test using an adhesive tape. The chalking adhering to the tape is examined against a contrasting background (either black or white, whichever gives the greater contrast) and the degree of chalking is assessed with reference to a rating scale.
4 Materials
4.1 Self-adhesive transparent tape, of width at least 15 mm.
Commercially available flexible tapes, transparent and without perceptible colour, have been found to be satisfactory. However, the quality of the tape affects the rating obtained. The type of tape shall therefore be agreed on between the interested parties and shall be stated in the test report.
4.2 Background, black or white, with matt finish, for example card or velvet having a short pile without a tendency to be crushed.

Main Focus Download

LEAVE A REPLY

Anonymous netizen Fill in information